Veneration vs. Worship: A Lesson in the Humor of Casuistry

When Romans Catholics and Eastern Orthodox say, "We are not worshiping Mary," and "We are not worshiping icons," the tragic reality is that too many will do X but call it Y. It is like watching them pour water into a cup while they insist on saying, "No, you are misled, I am just pouring water into the space above the cup, and it is only an accidental property of my pouring that it goes into the cup, and really the metaphysical substance of the cup is the matter itself, not the space qua space of the cup, and I am not pouring the water into the substance of the cup. You have been deceived into thinking I am pouring water into the cup." 


All one can say to this is, “Thy cup runneth over.”


They retort, “Sir, you must be one of those deceived Protestants. In truth, I am not ‘pouring’ the water. We reserve a distinction that pouring is only true pouring when the pouring device has either a lip on the side or a spout. Clearly neither of those conditions are being met here in this plain glass, so there isn’t even a possibility of ‘pouring.’ This could arguably be classed as a ‘controlled spilling,’ as one obscure school of paradoxical thought has argued, but certainly not ‘pouring.’ Frankly speaking, I would argue it isn't even a ‘controlled spilling,’ for spilling etymologically implies an absence of intention, or perhaps some sort of intention of recklessness, and so a ‘controlled spilling’ would be a contradiction in terms. 


“All that is happening is that my will is formally engaged in tipping the cup, and since my will is not causative of either gravity or fluid dynamics, the fact that water ends up through an impersonal casual chain of events entering into the cup could not be attributed to my agency which extends only to the tipping. Only persons can pour, and it would only be a metonymy that one could be said to pour when really it is just a personification of impersonal forces acting on the water. So again I'm not pouring water into the cup. The same action in a weightless environment would have utterly different accidents, so there is clearly nothing essential to my action of tipping the cup that can be metaphysically confused with pouring, for as a realist I would never lie and say I'm not tipping the cup for it is clear to the senses that I am tipping it (you dishonest and deceived Protestant nominalist).”


In other words, Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox are not “worshipping” Mary or icons. They are merely “venerating” them. They rest their case.


-The Reformed Ninja

Popular posts from this blog

Of Rock and Sand: A Critique of Josiah Trenham’s Appraisal of Protestantism

Image
Introduction In his attempt at growing the Orthodox Church, Archpriest Josiah Trenham has made a name for himself as a relatively erenic interlocutor with Protestant, Reformed, and Evangelical Christians of multiple stripes. In claiming common ground with them, he makes mention in an interview of his time as a student at Westminster Seminary under RC Sproul, where he became attracted to ( here ), if not convicted of ( here ), what he saw as the truth of Eastern Orthodoxy. According to his testimony, he even began his earnest search into Orthodoxy prior to going to seminary, planning his seminary studies ahead of time to coordinate with this specific search ( here ). He was even known at seminary for not likely continuing in the faith of his seminary ( here ). The significance of this background seems to be that, although Trenham states to have come from a Reformed background, it is clear from his testimony that he had notably departed in spirit from Reformed Christianity already durin
Read more

Anathema: Eastern Orthodoxy and The Ritual Cursing of All Other Christians

Image
  Many have been told that Eastern Orthodox Christianity is a welcoming, mystical version of Christianity, one that is not “hung up” on legalism or on excessive dogmatism. It may come as a surprise, then, to learn that Eastern Orthodox Christians not only formally believe that they are the only Christians on planet earth (Synod of Jerusalem of 1672, Decree 10), but that Eastern Orthodox Christians are called to ritually and formally curse, every year, all who disagree with them. The canonical document that they use to curse all non-Orthodox is called the Synodikon of Orthodoxy , and technically is supposed to be read yearly on the Feast of Orthodoxy, also called the Sunday of Orthodoxy, and the Triumph of Orthodoxy. From the titles of the Feast Day on which it is read, it is clearly being associated with the very identity of Eastern Orthodox Christianity, and of what it means to be an Eastern Orthodox Christian. It is celebrated on the first Sunday of Great Lent in the Eastern Orthodox
Read more

What is the Gospel According to the Eastern Orthodox Church?

Image
What is the Gospel according to the Eastern Orthodox Church? What is the Good News? What is it that the Eastern Orthodox Church proclaims to people struggling under the burden of sin and the reign of death? In order to answer this question, we will look at what their factual canonical position is. This will move the discussion past the mystical, impressionistic musings of the modern Eastern Orthodox reconstructions. The contemporary, quasi-conservative reimaginations of Orthodoxy, whether as the Neo-Patristic synthesis, or as a kind of theological-liturgical aesthetics, or as an Orthobro manosphere, or as Christian-flavored universalism and Perenialism, or as hesychastic pietism (the Philokalia was first published in 1782), are really just subtle, imitative departures from Biblical Christianity that are particularly pernicious, because they play to the prejudices of the sophisticated religionist, erecting castles in the sky that each would-be theologian climbs ropes of sand up to. It b
Read more